On 21 August 2012 19:14, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 21 August 2012 16:43, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The place is [email protected]
>
> It would be better for the site to always reference specific URLs,
> even for the current release.
> That way it would be obvious sooner if the api docs were missing.
>
> The immediate fix is to add a soft link to 2.4.
>
> I'll do that ASAP.

Fixed, but it will be a while before it syncs.

>> Gary
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Tucker <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:00 AM
>> Subject: IO Javadoc version incorrect
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>>  I'm not sure if you are the right person to notify about this, but this
>> link:
>>
>> http://commons.apache.org/io/api-release/index.html
>>
>> supposedly leads to the Apache Commons IO 2.4 Javadoc, but as you can see
>> the header on that page still claims that it is Commons IO 2.3). Is this
>> actually the 2.3 doc or is the header and title just incorrect?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
>> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to