On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases?
Yes. > I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it still > breaks BC. Are sure we want that? Are the removed methods confusing in a > way that can be construed as keeping them being a bug? If the code is not being used by external clients then BC compatibility is irrelevant. This is the case here. > Gary > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:29 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.2 based on RC1. >> >> [ ] +1 release it >> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care >> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... >> >> tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_2_RC1/(r1413727) >> >> site: >> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.2-RC1/ >> >> The Javadocs (1.4.1) link does not work, nor does the download link. >> These will be OK once the site is deployed. >> >> Source and binary archives (tar.gz and .zip) and Maven jars: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-078/ >> >> [The tar.gz and .zip files will be moved to dist/commons/net before >> promoting the Maven jars to release status] >> >> Vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
