On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:05:13PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/27/12 1:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > On 11/27/2012 04:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> Quoting from the previous thread about this subject:
> >>> As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now.
> >> [Luc Maisonobe, September 14, 2012]
> >>
> >> Plenty of needed work has been done since then. Most of it could have been
> >> done _after_ releasing 3.1!
> >> Most of the current contributors agree that releases should happen more
> >> often; yet they don't.
> >> I would like that a set of objective criteria be written down that would
> >> define when a new release is deemed adequate. [I had suggested some.]
> >> This discussion should be held in another thread since (as the above quote
> >> summarizes), it was agreed that the 3.1 release was due.
> >>
> >> At this point, I propose to start the release process using the "old" 
> >> (about
> >> to be deprecated) procedure.
> >> Indeed, I surely do not want the release to be further delayed because of
> >> "newbie" mistakes on using the new procedure (CMS for the site, etc.).
> >> Let's "divide and conquer": We release 3.1 now and allow users to benefit
> >> from the many new features and bug fixes. While they test the new release,
> >> we begin to prepare 3.2 with the new procedure, starting with the site.
> 
> +1
> 
> Depending on how much happens bet 3.1 and the next one, we could
> consider a 3.1.1.

Yes; we should define the various criteria to be considered in order to
decide which type of release should be made, and when they should occur.

Regards,
Gilles

> 
> I have some uncommitted stuff to address MATH-672, but I don't want
> to hold up the release for this.  If I can't get it finished before
> the first RC hits, I will get it in; otherwise it can wait.
> 
> Phil
> >>
> >> OK?
> > +1
> >
> > Thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to