I'm not opposed to multiple backends, but this dictates that [weaver] must
have its own implementation-neutral API.  I don't know that I'm prepared to
create it.

Matt


On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I like the name weaver.
>
> Does it make sense to allow different libs to be plugged in? BCEL,
> ASM... Or do do we have to pick one?
>
> Gary
>
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 17:55, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, it looks like the most comfortable avenue for everyone is Commons
> > [weaver].  IMO [weaver] would look like a framework for implementing any
> > kind of code weaving, so the most important decision is the look of the
> > API, and it would seem that eating our own dog food would be appropriate
> in
> > Commons.  Thus I would propose that [weaver] be built on top of [BCEL],
> and
> > I would think it likely that we might provide a nice (fluent?) API for
> > common code modifications.
> >
> > Firstly, does anyone object to using [BCEL] as [weaver]'s foundation?;
> > secondly, can anyone tell me what (Java 7?) features [BCEL] currently
> > lacks?; thirdly, does any of us already have the expertise to add these?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Le 29/11/2012 19:12, Matt Benson a écrit :
> >>> This would go back to the idea of something like a BCEL library
> >>> (notwithstanding the fact that the existing privilizer code does not
> use
> >>> BCEL).
> >>
> >> For such a component BCEL would be an implementation detail, so I don't
> >> think it should be a sub part of BCEL.
> >>
> >> If an annotation equivalent to @SwingInvokeLater can be added to the
> >> project I would be highly interested in using it.
> >>
> >> As for the name of the component, what about Commons Weaver ?
> >>
> >> Emmanuel Bourg
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to