On 5 March 2013 16:43, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. Why not Java 6 since 5 is mostly dead.
1.5 is not totally dead, so why exclude those users who still have Java 1.5? If there is some feature of 1.6 that would make a big difference to the performance/functionality then it night be OK, but there is no point requiring Java 6 otherwise. > Gary > > On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:05, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all guys, >> >> since I need [fileupload] @work, I intend to do a major bump that >> recently involved other commons component. >> >> Any objection? >> TIA, >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
