2013/3/6 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
> On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation?
> >>
> >> Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old
> methods.
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >>
> >> @Deprecated
> >> public int getContentLength() { ... }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> * @since x.x
> >> */
> >>
> >> public long getLongContentLength() { ... }
> >> or
> >> public long getContentLengthLong() { ... }
> >> or
> >> public long longContentLength() { ... }
> >
> > that should be enough to bump to 1.3.0 since there are APIs addition -
> > do you agree?
>
> Yes, except it should be 1.3, not 1.3.0.
> If a point release is then required, it is 1.3.1, but point releases
> are fairly rare.
>
Having OSGi this may not be the best convention, as OSGi requires version
numbers to have 3 digits.
Benedikt
>
> > -Simo
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> > http://www.99soft.org/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter
