Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Well, it could be recoded like this: >> >> return !(o1.intValue() % 2 == 0 ^ o2.intValue() % 2 == 0); >> >> which is not really clearer but it is fewer chars.. >> >> Gary >> > > well, looks smart to me! :)
Are you sure, that we don't have a checkstyle rule for too smart code? ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
