Hi Bene, >> >> which is the side effect of having them enabled and not used? >> we are no longer using Revision and Date for the known reason, so even >> if they are enabled... what's the downside? >> > > I'm playing the devil's advocate here: aren't you the guy you tries to > avoid unnecessary code/config as much as possible? I'm thinking of our > discussions regarding static imports... ;-) IMHO this also applies here. >
just for the sake of satisfying the lawyer inside you: I asked, accidentally without using the `please` word - and please take note that it is not my usual habit -, to explain where the _issue_ that needs to be fixed is, on having properties enabled that are _not used_ - again, this is "unfortunately" my default SVN config that has to be compliant not just with Commons, which is not the only project I am involved in. In this case, my friend, you are overkilling the discussion and rather than having a tech argumentation here, you are trying to put ME on the debate - I don't understand what did you want to demonstrate with this message, or maybe I want to refuse to understand. Ah, and BTW, at the time of static imports, there was not a problem that needed a fix: we had two different opinions and you put efforts on proving that mine was wrong, where at the end of the day what emerged is that both are valid. http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
