@Gilles: that's right (and I'm part of people thinking this is not the main
issue) but everybody seems happy to use git instead of svn so let's go

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



2013/10/10 Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>

> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:41:11 -0400, James Carman wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git.  I
>> think it's time to put it to a vote.  So, here we go:
>>
>> +1 - yes, move to Git
>> -1 - no, do not move to Git
>>
>
> -1
>
> Some people have indicated that this move might not address the problem
> it is supposed to. No conclusive answer has been provided.
>
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to