The "binding" annotations on this thread kind of bug me here - we should be deciding this kind of thing by community consensus. "Binding" is only meaningful in release votes and VOTE-ing in general should be a last resort rather than early step in getting to consensus. I have tried to keep up with the threads but have yet to see a really clear rationale for the move. It would help me personally get on board with allocating some of my own scarce volunteering time to this if I someone could summarize what exactly we will get out of it.
Phil On 10/10/13 7:50 AM, James Carman wrote: > All, > > We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I > think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: > > +1 - yes, move to Git > -1 - no, do not move to Git > > The vote will be left open for 72 hours. Go! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
