Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote:
> Hi. > >> [...] >> >> I had originally used .of() for consistency with Commons Lang (is >> that >> persuasive?) [...] > > This poses a question as to whether we want to include features > that are not currently intended for strictly internal purposes. > The intention was certainly not to duplicate what's in Lang. > > See also comments on this on the bug-tracker: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1041 Actually the first time I recognized the create was looking at the commit message, then I found the JIRA issue and after commenting there I saw this thread ;-) With my comment I just wanted to point your attention to the fact that the naming might surprise users of both libraries. It's up to the active math committers to make up their minds. Regarding the nodeps policy: It's an old discussion, that has possibly new aspects with the current Maven ecosystem. OTOH libraries like lang start to get fat and that might be another reason, why such casual dependencies are avoided. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
