go for it! :) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello André > > 2014-03-03 9:57 GMT+01:00 André Diermann <andre.dierm...@gmail.com>: > > > 2014-03-03 9:10 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > The stuff that we have implemented in the Assertions class can be > > replaced > > > by the methods available in Objects from java 7. You're right about > > > MethodUtil and TypeUtil. > > > > > > > > Just to be clear what you mean by replace: > > - wrapping the methods from Objects in the Assertions class to keep the > API > > or > > - get rid of the Assertions class completly and directly use the methods > > from Objects class. > > > > If okay, I would like to create a ticket and to provide a patch for this > > tonight :) > > > > I'd say let's go for the latter. Assertions is an internal class (package > private) so there is no need to keep it. > > Benedikt > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, but a test dependency doesn't get pulled in a user declares a > > > dependency to BU2. It's just that we don't want that users have lang in > > > their class path just because we need two or three methods here and > > there. > > > > > > > Ok, that makes sense. :) > > > > > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter >
