>I would prefer it if the reports were warnings rather than errors, but >generally they seem sensible.
Allow me to disagree. Breaking the javadoc just because a @param is missing is imo plain wrong. Usually parameters should be self-explaining. I personally only document interfaces and methods where it is *not* clear what the params intend. Please don't let us end up with tons of unnecessary (because obvious) Javadocs just to make java8 happy. I've done some research and asked some Java8 devs I know. Seems <additionalparam>-Xdoclint:all,-missing</additionalparam> could do the trick. Still need to test it though. We should btw add this to the apache-parent pom and not only to commons-parent. LieGrue, strub On Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 20:51, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: On 16 April 2014 19:32, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I personally like the default Java 8 behavior and I would not want to >> disable it. > >I would prefer it if the reports were warnings rather than errors, but >generally they seem sensible. > >-1 to adding it to the parent POM as a default. >It might have been OK to do so if it were possible to activate it only >when Java 8 is being used to a component that targets Java 5,6,7. >But suppressing DocLint for source that targets Java 8 seems a very bad idea. >Unfortunately ANDed activation conditions for profiles are borked and >have been for ages. > >I think it's OK to use in component POMs because each component will >be different. >And it can be easily removed when the source has been updated. > >> Gary >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think the implication was that adding it to the parent POM would not >>> encourage us to actually *solve* the underlying issue. ;) >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Le 16/04/2014 18:41, sebb AT ASF a écrit : >>> > > See below for one way to automatically suppress Javadoc errors when >>> > > running under Java 8 >>> > > >>> > > It should not be adopted as a permanent measure, but may be useful >>> > > whilst Javadoc is being fixed. >>> > >>> > Can we add that to the parent pom? >>> > >>> > Emmanuel Bourg >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second >> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
