We talked about pushing 6.0 out a long time ago. We need an RM. I'm unavail, moving, and so on.
Gary On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Benedikt Ritter <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, I'm not a developer of BCEL, so I don't know. :o) > > Do you have the time to push a release out? > > B > > > 2014-07-27 12:35 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]>: > > > Because it's a major released with many new features, it deserves a > > version bump. > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > On July 27, 2014 12:08:55 PM CEST, Benedikt Ritter <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >Hi Emmanuel, > > > > > >why do we release it as BCEL 6 if it's binary compatible? > > > > > >Benedikt > > > > > > > > >2014-07-27 11:59 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> BCEL 6 is ready to be released and it is binary compatible, that will > > >fix > > >> clirr. I'll prepare the vote this week. > > >> > > >> Emmanuel Bourg > > >> > > >> > > >> On July 27, 2014 10:18:51 AM CEST, Benedikt Ritter > > ><[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> >Thanks for the pointer. How do you feel about pushing out a 5.3 that > > >> >only > > >> >contains the Java 8 fixes? > > >> > > > >> >B > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >2014-07-26 15:14 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory <[email protected]>: > > >> > > > >> >> I think the trunk handles some or all of Java 8 now. See BCEL-174, > > >> >> BCEL-175. > > >> >> > > >> >> Gary > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Benedikt Ritter > > ><[email protected]> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi, > > >> >> > > > >> >> > when building [lang] with Java 8 I get the following error [1]: > > >> >Caused > > >> >> by: > > >> >> > org.apache.bcel.classfile.ClassFormatException: Invalid byte tag > > >in > > >> >> > constant pool: 18 > > >> >> > > > >> >> > So it looks like Clirr is using a BCEL version that doesn't > > >support > > >> >Java > > >> >> 8. > > >> >> > Can anybody tell me what the current state of BCEL is? We have > > >> >version 6 > > >> >> in > > >> >> > trunk. the latest release is 5.2. So I assume we're breaking BC. > > >> >Can we > > >> >> > release a fix for 5.2 that can handle Java 8? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Regards, > > >> >> > Benedikt > > >> >> > > > >> >> > [1] https://paste.apache.org/khuq > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > >> >> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > >> >> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > >> >> > http://github.com/britter > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > > >> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > > >> >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > > >> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > > >> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > > >> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > >> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > >> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >-- > > >> >http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > >> >http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > >> >http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > >> >http://github.com/britter > > >> > > >> > > >> Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > >http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > >http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > >http://github.com/britter > > > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
