No but fine by me <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:08/25/2014 6:25 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> </div><div>Subject: Re: [BCEL] Trying a release? </div><div> </div>Hm... did we discuss going to Java 6 or 7. 5 is pretty dead.
Gary On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Dave Brosius <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the driving thing is that it is bumped up to jdk1.5 from 1.4 > > > > On 08/25/2014 05:08 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> Le 22/08/2014 12:12, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : >> >> If BCEL6 can be used as a drop in replacement, then not changing the >>> coordinates might be a good idea (but begs the question of why it has a >>> new major version). >>> >> I asked about the next version number back in April and the consensus >> was that a major version change better reflected the amount of changes >> since the last release. >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
