On 19 September 2014 00:14, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > The first release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny. > > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC1/ > (r1621539) > > Release notes: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > Distribution files: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/
The directory is normally called source/ not sources/ Please rename The source archive does not agree with SVN, as it is missing several files: LICENSE-header.txt checkstyle.xml docs/verifier/chap1.bmp docs/verifier/chap1.eps etc. > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/ Clirr reports several incompatibilities However these have been documented in the release notes and should only affect source builds (so not a blocker) Findbugs reports lots of errors (not blocking) > Javadoc: > http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/site/apidocs/ > > Maven artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1044/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now. > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [X] -1 I oppose this release because... Files missing from the source archives > > Thank you for your reviews, > > Emmanuel Bourg > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
