On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 07/10/2014 11:26, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > > > If nobody object I'll remove this cache, the impact on the performance > > is too important to enable it by default, and the static state smells > > like a quick and dirty implementation. This feature could return as a > > pluggable cache if someone wants to provide a patch. > > I looked at the cache in ObjectType, this one keeps only 200 instances. > When parsing rt.jar it saved 92% of the ObjectType instances and ~13MB > of memory. The overhead was about 7% (820ms instead of 767ms). > > I wonder if this one is worth keeping. > Can you flush it? Can you disable it? Gary > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
