This is all reasonable but I do not think this is what our site documents. So let's make sure we either follow our current charter or document a new system.
Gary <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> </div><div>Date:11/09/2014 08:23 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Setup up new sandbox component "Commons Text" with git as primary vcs (Was: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component) </div><div> </div>Le 09/11/2014 13:43, Gary Gregory a écrit : > How would you know that commons-text is a sandbox component? You would not > if it is git, unless the URL has 'sandbox' in it. It's a sandbox component because its site will state so. I still think using a special directory layout or naming scheme for the sandbox components is a bad idea, it just makes the transition to proper, the vcs and the site management more complicated. Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
