On 2015-01-30, sebb wrote: > On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>> - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Should it be? >> This is only there for historical reasons, I don't even think the other >> components still have a file like this. I've removed it completely. >>> - there is a typo in the release notes. The first line says "Apache >>> Apache Commons Compress" >> fixed, thanks. >>> - will clients who extended ZCompressorInputStream be affected by the >>> change in it's superclass hierarchy? In other words, is the change to >>> ZCompressorInputStream reported by clirr binary compatible with 1.9? >>> The last one would be a blocker for me. It could be resolved by restoring >>> the _internal_ package and deprecate it right away. >> It is reported as not compatible, so yes, we are breaking backwards >> compatibility. > Note that Clirr does not distinguish binary and source compatibility. > Breaking binary compatibility is almost never a good idea. > However source compatibility may be less important in some cases. > Which incompatibility is it? The superclass of ZCompressorInputStream has changed from one we've removed with the old __internal__ package to a new one in the now supported lzw package. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
