On 04/09/2015 05:50 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:44:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 04/09/2015 11:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Trying to get back on work, after a while ... >>> >>> I have just fixed a very annoying (and difficult to reproduce) bug >>> concerning BSP trees in 3.4.1. As I am on it, I will also try to >>> fix MATH-1211 created recently. >>> >>> The bug I fixed is really important as it breaks some other tools, >>> so I would need to release the fix officially as soon as possible. >>> >>> Therefore, I would like to publish a version 3.5 in the next few days. >>> Of course, I will do the release management hurdle. What do you >>> think about it? >> >> I see only one actual feature being added to 3.5 so far (the additional >> method introduced to Descriptive and SummaryStatistics). >> >> We could copy the current 3_X branch to a 3_4_X branch and remove this >> specific feature to really release a pure bugfix release for the 3.4 >> branch. > > Alternatively, we could leave it (and I should add another similar before > release)... > Is there a practical reason that needs preserving the 3.5 option?
not really imho, but it would be quite unusual for math to release another minor release so quickly (and almost entirely consisting of bugfixes). Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
