I'm okay with that too. Apache Math

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:

> Just plain and simple "Apache Math" maybe?
> Or is it taken already?
>
> Gilles
>
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:46:17 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 1/24/16 2:16 PM, James Carman wrote:
> >> I guess it depends on the scope of what the new TLP is going to do.
> >
> > This is slightly jumping the gun, as we do have the opportunity in
> > forming the new TLP to revisit the initial goals of [math]; but I
> > suspect that initially at least we will mostly continue to be a
> > general-purpose Java math library, trying to provide IP-clean,
> > easily integrated, standard algorithm-based solutions to common math
> > programming problems.  We have grown to the point where we will
> > almost certainly break the distribution up into separate
> > "components."  No umbrella, but likely multiple release artifacts.
> > Similar in some ways to what happened with [http], which is why I
> > suggested the same approach to naming.
> >
> > Regarding picking a mathematician for the name, I don't much like
> > that idea as whoever you choose, you end up loading some math area
> > and / or cultural bias into the name.
> >
> > Phil
> >> Umbrella projects aren't that popular these days, from what I
> >> understand.
> >> Maybe an homage to a famous mathematician? Apache Newton? Apache
> >> Euler?
> >> Apache Euclid?
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:08 PM Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> We need to agree on a name.  My own preference is for a boring,
> >>> descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't
> >>> be offended if others want to be more creative.
> >>>
> >>> My suggestion is
> >>>
> >>> MathComponents
> >>>
> >>> Hearkens back to HttpComponents, which has worked pretty well.
> >>>
> >>> Phil
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to