I've had progress streams and writers laying around for a long time. I'll have to take the time to donate them to [io]...
Gary On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 27/03/2016 18:41, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > > Is this a feature we generally want to see in compress? And if so, does > > the branch make sense or should we tackle this in a different way? > > I like the idea of progress tracking, and the implementation on the > branch is ok (I'd just add a try-catch around the calls to notify(), so > an error in a listener doesn't prevent the others from getting the > notification). > > That said, maybe the concept of progress tracking is more general than > [compress] and could be implemented as a decorator stream in [io] (along > with an approximation of the time left to process the stream). > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
