As I recall 2.0 did not really include sandbox as part of the release because we didn’t want to officially support the sandbox components. They might have been included in the source distribution though. But these emails make it sound like it is exactly the opposite of what I would have expected.
Ralph > On May 2, 2016, at 6:35 AM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > > sebb wrote: >> The "Download and Build" page is more suitable for developers than end >> users (especially if it points to trunk, which is not voted on) so >> should not be the primary download page. >> >> Also there seem to be two identical copies of each of the non-Maven >> release artifacts: >> commons-vfs-2.1-bin >> and >> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.1-bin >> >> etc. >> >> >> Are they supposed to be the same? If not what is missing from one of them? > > I have no idea. This is just what your build process did... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
