Benedikt Ritter wrote:
- The name is different from Release 1.0. It has been vfs-1.0, no it is
>  commons-vfs-project-2.1. I think we should stick with the convention
>  established with v1.0.
>

I've looked at the tag names again. It looks completely mixed up. We have:

vfs-1.0/
commons-vfs2-project-2.0/
commons-vfs-project-2.1-RC1/

It looks like release 2.0 has introduced a new convention. It would be good
to follow this convention with all upcoming releases...



Ack! I meant to follow suite with the 2.0 release, but it seems like I missed the "2" in "vfs2". Thanks for catching it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to