Thank Stian for your review!

>We also need a second <Version> for the (future) source/binary distributions 
>with ControlledSource href=https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/crypto/ - you 
>would need to duplicate the OpenSSL and JavaSE <ControlledSource> for that. 
>See other examples in the XML file.
Thank you for pointing it out, we should add it.

> is it 1.0.0 we're targeting for the first Commons Crypto release?
Yes, 1.0.0 would be the first release. 

I have updated the staging website. 
http://www.staging.apache.org/licenses/exports/index.html 


Regards
Dapeng

-----Original Message-----
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [mailto:st...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 6:45 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in 
commons?

Thanks! Looks good.

We also need a second <Version> for the (future) source/binary distributions 
with ControlledSource href=https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/crypto/ - you 
would need to duplicate the OpenSSL and JavaSE <ControlledSource> for that. See 
other examples in the XML file.

In the second Version you can say <Names>1.0.0 and later</Names> - is it 1.0.0 
we're targeting for the first Commons Crypto release?

On 31 May 2016 at 11:03, Sun, Dapeng <dapeng....@intel.com> wrote:
> Thank Stian and Haifeng, I have updated the file at my cms workspace. 
> If the change is okay for you, I will try to commit it to 
> http://www.staging.apache.org/licenses/exports/
>
> Index: trunk/content/licenses/exports/index.page/eccnmatrix.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/content/licenses/exports/index.page/eccnmatrix.xml    (revision 
> 1655892)
> +++ trunk/content/licenses/exports/index.page/eccnmatrix.xml    (working copy)
> @@ -212,6 +212,25 @@
>      </Version>
>    </Product>
>    <Product>
> +    <Name>Apache Commons Crypto</Name>
> +    <Version>
> +      <Names>development</Names>
> +      <ECCN>5D002</ECCN>
> +      <ControlledSource 
> href="https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-crypto.git";>
> +        <Manufacturer>ASF</Manufacturer>
> +        <Why>designed for use with encryption library</Why>
> +      </ControlledSource>
> +      <ControlledSource href="http://www.openssl.org/source/";>
> +        <Manufacturer>The OpenSSL Project</Manufacturer>
> +        <Why>general-purpose cryptography library included with OpenSSL</Why>
> +      </ControlledSource>
> +      <ControlledSource 
> href="http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html";>
> +        <Manufacturer>Oracle</Manufacturer>
> +        <Why>general-purpose cryptography library (JCE) included with 
> Java</Why>
> +      </ControlledSource>
> +    </Version>
> +  </Product>
> +  <Product>
>      <Name>Apache Commons OpenPGP</Name>
>      <Version>
>        <Names>development</Names>
>
>
> Regards
> Dapeng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [mailto:st...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 5:20 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in 
> commons?
>
> I think we are good to continue as a "normal" 5D002 self-classification.
>
> Great if you will have a go, let me know if you would like me to help or 
> review!
>
> See http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html#sources for svn details, 
> linking to 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/lic
> enses/exports/index.page/eccnmatrix.xml
>
> I found just being a committer was enough to update the svn, after 
> which it should be live on 
> http://www.staging.apache.org/licenses/exports/
>
> If that works fine, then any ASF member can publish it using 
> https://cms.apache.org/ for the main website (it can be a bit slow)
>
> Normally it is the PMC Chair that sends the registration email after that.
> On 30 May 2016 8:09 a.m., "Chen, Haifeng" <haifeng.c...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stian,
> If we decide to go ECCN 5D002 self-classify category, do you have an idea 
> that what I can proceed next?
>
> I saw you updated eccnmatrix.xml file for Taverna. Would you please help 
> share where is the place of the file and who has the privilege to make an 
> similar update for Commons Crypto?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Haifeng
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chen, Haifeng [mailto:haifeng.c...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 9:42 AM
> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in 
> commons?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-256 is created and commented to 
> track this.
>
> If we think this analysis makes sense, we will choose to go ECCN 5D002 
> self-classify category. Will wait for a few days for feedbacks.
>
> Regards,
> Haifeng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chen, Haifeng [mailto:haifeng.c...@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:57 PM
> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in 
> commons?
>
> Thanks Stian and Benedikt!
>
>> Let's create a Jira issue to track the categorisation process.
> Do you mean to create a JIRA in LEGAL similar to LEGAL-250 to track this?
>
>
> Regards,
> Haifeng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:36 PM
> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in 
> commons?
>
> Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo., 23. Mai 2016 um
> 09:34 Uhr:
>
>> On 23 May 2016 3:42 a.m., "Chen, Haifeng" <haifeng.c...@intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > So how about we go to the process of ECCN 5D002 self-classify 
>> > category
>> and registration like Taverna did?
>>
>> Agree on your evaluation, so ECCN 5D002 is good. This makes things a 
>> lot easier! :)
>>
>> Let's create a Jira issue to track the categorisation process.
>>
>
> +1! good work everybody.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to