Hello Sebb, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 7. Juni 2016 um 18:09 Uhr:
> Does the project *need* to use any Java7 features? > > Is it working OK now with Java 6 as the minimum? > > If the answers are No and Yes then moving to Java 7 seems to me to be > unnecessary for the initial release. > I think people have expressed in various ways that they don't want to work on projects which are stuck on dead Java version. I think we have to respect this. Benedikt > > > On 7 June 2016 at 16:49, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > I thought there was a discussion after the project was set up to move to > Java 7? > > > > That being said I see that the pom still defines 1.6 as the target... > > > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Are we really starting a new component on a dead platform like Java 6? > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> -- > >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ > >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > > > > > -- > > Marcelo > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
