Can it be used in non-I/O situations? On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 8:15 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IO is a better fit than NET, but I'm not sure that it is better than LANG. > > On 12 June 2016 at 13:03, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > > It has general stream/reader stuff too. > > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:53 AM Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> schrieb am So., 12. Juni > 2016 > >> um 13:50 Uhr: > >> > >> > Yes, so I guess Commons IO would be the best fit. > >> > > >> > >> Really? When talking about I/O I always think about file system > >> operations... > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Am 12.06.2016 um 13:40 schrieb James Carman: > >> > > Is it only I/O related? > >> > > > >> > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:05 AM Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> > >> CircuitBreaker is a pattern usually used when working with remote > >> > systems. > >> > >> We have a CircuitBreaker implementation added to [LANG] in the > >> > concurrent > >> > >> package. Now I'm wondering whether it would better fit into [NET]. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> > >> > >> Benedikt > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
