> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 15:08
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
> 
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:33:58 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > -1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Reason for objection:
> >
> >  I think the framing of this vote is confusing.
> >
> >  1. There appears to be less ability to go to TLP than there was at
> > the time the previous motion passed.
> >
> >  2. The discussion (but not the [VOTE]) speaks of going to TLP via
> > the incubator.  It has to be one or the other.  Propose a podling to
> > Incubator or propose a TLP to the Board.  There is no assurance that
> > a
> > podling will graduate and it doesn't fit to make that a condition.
> > One could raise the special circumstances at general-incubator, but I
> > think that works best with something specific (but malleable) in
> > hand.
> >
> >  3. The Incubator is reluctant to start podlings from scratch, as
> > Niall observes.
> 
> Could you please expand on how 3 Commons PMC members and 3 would-be
> contributors are assimilated to "scratch"?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gilles
[orcmid] 

I don't have that information.  It probably doesn't matter with regard to the 
larger issues here, including knowing what the agreed next-action is when the 
[VOTE] succeeds with binding votes.

 - Dennis

> 
[ ... ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to