On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:53:44 +0300, Artem Barger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Gilles
<gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
That's what I was afraid of; in this case, it would defeat the
purpose:
We shouldn't have to release "core-2.0" (thus a with change of the
top-level package name), just because we want to fix something in
the
"utils" code.
Given this situation, would it be possible to consider a separate
component: "commons-rng-utils"?
I think following layout should actually work:
commons-rng-parent (pom) v1.0
|____commons-rng-core (jar) v1.0
|____commons-rng-tools (jar) v1.0
And suppose you want to update commong-rng-tools from v1.0 to v2.0
it will
look like:
commons-rng-parent (pom) v1.1
|____commons-rng-core (jar) v1.0
|____commons-rng-tools (jar) v2.0
where you do not really have to touch version of core component.
Unless
this is somehow
restricted by ASF commons coding standards or something.
The restriction, as Jörg wrote, is that a single component can only
release artifacts with the same version.
If we have to put the tools in a separate component, it will already
inherit from "commons-parent". Then, is there an interest to define
an additional "commons-rng-parent" level.
Regards,
Gilles
Or, do you have something else in your mind?
Best regards,
Artem Barger.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
