Speaking for myself either is fine. I find svn commands easier to deal with than git, but github is easy to use as a site.
Eric On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:53:01 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote: > >> Is this a vote of some sort to convert from svn? >> > > Not really (at least if your question is whether I ask to > convert the whole sandbox, or all sandbox components). > > I thought that a sandbox component had to use the same repository > as all other sandbox components: > $ svn list http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox > > Hence I suggested to Eric to create the new "filter" one. > > But then I saw that the "Text" component is not listed by the above, > command but uses git. > > So if this is OK, I'd rather ask for a new git repository for "filter" > too (that is currently empty). > > Regards, > Gilles > > > So far we've all been >> pretty on board with migrating Commons projects to git. >> >> On 4 November 2016 at 16:27, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >> >> Hello. >>> >>> I noticed that the "Text" component uses "git". >>> It would be simpler to also use git for the "filter" component. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Gilles >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
