> On Feb 2, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:41:17 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4).
>>> 
>>> Tag name:
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4 (signature can be checked from git using 'git 
>>> tag -v')
> 
> $ git tag -v commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4
> object 65e4314fbd6c3a8f5c248d07a4ccffc1f0ea8bb9
> type commit
> tag commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4
> tagger Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> 1485782752 -0500
> 
> Tag commons text for release 1.0-beta-1 RC4
> error: no signature found
> 

Fair. I didn't sign the tag. 

> ?
> 
>>> 
>>> Tag URL:
>>>  
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-text.git;a=commit;h=65e4314fbd6c3a8f5c248d07a4ccffc1f0ea8bb9
>>> 
>>> Commit ID the tag points at:
>>>  65e4314fbd6c3a8f5c248d07a4ccffc1f0ea8bb9
>>> 
>>> Site:
>>>  http://home.apache.org/~chtompki/commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4
> 
> There are 200 errors reported by CheckStyle:
>  http://home.apache.org/~chtompki/commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4/checkstyle.html
> 
> PMD reports a few problems (mainly unused fields and methods):
>  http://home.apache.org/~chtompki/commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4/pmd.html
> 
> Are these code duplications unavoidable?
>  http://home.apache.org/~chtompki/commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4/cpd.html
> 

I can keep chipping away at these for sure. 

>>> 
>>> Distribution files (committed at revision 18041):
>>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/text/
>>> 
>>> Distribution files hashes (SHA1):
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-bin.tar.gz
>>>  (SHA: dcedb6acc9e8dee75ef9ebefc3a03d20df1d84af)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-bin.zip
>>>  (SHA1: b1fa8083bfdcec354a97c23468aa63082990febe)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-src.tar.gz
>>>  (SHA1: 06e7bee6a1a710fb2a68472bbbd3209bdc66802c)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-src.zip
>>>  (SHA1: 62f405f55689526ca87fd228ed4ae4a4cf4ad107)
>>> 
>>> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes:
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-javadoc.jar
>>>  (SHA1: 771928f5f5439dbf75d857b4a8da83646ba854e8)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-sources.jar
>>>  (SHA1: 104e0d8fe8791d7e6f0653fee406150e6f80ee0e)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-test-sources.jar
>>>  (SHA1: 0e0b2ea171d8f82c4775b0e472c41b316052de8f)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1-tests.jar
>>>  (SHA1: 664d9d71be733cc8240a4164e6a3971fc9e95578)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1.jar
>>>  (SHA1: 6ef0390cf936f21e07ed47f34ba7eab0d918606b)
>>>  commons-text-1.0-beta-1.pom
>>>  (SHA1: 7b65ac70d36c5acf3bcad87ed2df9e7eba111726)
>>> 
>>> KEYS file to check signatures:
>>>  http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>> 
>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1234
>>> 
>>> Please select one of the following options[1]:
>>> [ ] +1 Release it.
>>> [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care.
>>> [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ...
>>> [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ...
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open at least 72 hours, i.e. until
>>> 2017-02-02T15:00:00Z
>>> (this is UTC time).
>>> --------
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Rob
>>> 
>>> [1] http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>> 
>> I haven’t heard anyone on this release candidate, and I was wondering
>> if some folks could take a look. I’d be happy with any votes
>> regardless of direction.
> 
> Since it is a "beta" release, are there different (more relaxed)
> requirements?

I'm curious here too. 

Many thanks. 
-Rob

> 
> Gilles
> 
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> -Rob
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to