Hello, > Am 11.03.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Yasser Zamani <yasser.zam...@live.com>: > > > > On 3/8/2017 12:21 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hello Yasser, >> >> Sorry for the late reply! I have been on vacation and needed some time to go >> through all the mails that have piled up :-) > Hello Benedikt , thank you very much for your answer >> >> StringEscapeUtils contains general String escaping routines. It does not >> focus on business related escaping (how would you draw that line anyway?). >> escapeEcmaScript just escapes the characters in a String using EcmaScript >> String rules. >> Can you please provide a failing test case showing the problem you see? >> > Yes, you're right. I mis-used the method. it is for escaping an ecma > string that can be used inside an another ecma string but I wrongly used > that for escape from script injection! >> So „<" and „>“ are not escaped by escapeEcmaScript.. > My failure :( >>> >>> And finally just for a curious, why `ESCAPE_ECMASCRIPT` does not include >>> `OctalUnescaper` but `UNESCAPE_ECMASCRIPT = UNESCAPE_JAVA` does? >> >> Again it is because it just escapes according to EcmaScript escaping rules. > It's some weird , you mean escaping ecma script does not need escaping > octal, but un-escaping ecma script does need also un-escaping octal? > i.e. inverse of escaping is not equal to unescaping and vice versa.
To be honest, I don’t know :o) I’ve added Rob to the thread, because he has done quite some work in Commons Text and may know why this makes sense… Regards, Benedikt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
