Hello, > Am 11.07.2017 um 06:55 schrieb Simon Spero <sesunc...@gmail.com>: > > Since it's an interface, I could change it to IHasACharset? > > Or If you prefer I could rename it to YouGiveLove? (Lucky Millenials- you > aren't headsonged)
I recommend to leave this kind of irony out of mailing list communication. This is probably your personal style of communicating, but it is hard to understand in remote communication with people from other cultural backgrounds. It makes communication more boring to remove this kind of sugar, but it helps to avoid misunderstandings. Cheers, Benedikt > > The name follows a pattern for interfaces of this sort, which are basically > retrofit markers for the presence of property, (with associated getters). > I've seen it used in other projects, but it might be bleed through from > some OWL / RDF patterns. > > I'm not in love with the pattern but it required the least thought :) > > (java 8 makes this sort of interface moot, as the accessor can be added as > a default method. It is even be a candidate for the proper use of Optional. > ) > > On Jul 5, 2017 1:14 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO. > > CharsetProvider is the obvious (to me) better name even though there > already is a class called java.nio.charset.spi.CharsetProvider. > > Alternatives could be CharsetContainer, CharsetAccessor, CharsetGetter, ? > > Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
