I have to agree with Jochen and am -1 to this proposal. I have stated before 
that I don’t want to see Commons become the placeholder for all the Math 
related components. If Math has stuff that can’t be maintained then create a 
MathLegacy project in the sandbox and move the stuff there.

Ralph

> On Aug 19, 2017, at 5:44 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> 
>> How about creating "Commons Geometry"?
> 
> Honestly: There are other subprojects (Vfs comes to mind), which are
> perfectly able to produce a set of jar file without adding to the list
> of jar files for every one. Why do you require a new subproject?
> 
> Given the amount of noise, that numbers, RNG, etc. have produced over
> the last year, I am more than hesitant to have more of that. (In
> particular, when considering the rather limited amount of releases,
> which have grown out of that. The "Downloads" section for numbers is
> still pointing to RNG.)
> 
> As far, as I am concerned, I am clearly -1
> 
> Jochen
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
> 
> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to