On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm 2 questions just to ensure we are aligned and mail didn't loose > information: > > - for trunk: do we move the version to 2.3-SNAPSHOT? > If you expect the next version to include _minor_ changes (like minor new features), then 2.3-SNAPSHOT is fine. If you are only going to fix bugs, then 2.3.1-SNAPSHOT would be appropriate. > - for next release: i'm not sure what's the difference is at the moment but > any reason to not do a 2.3 from trunk? (asking from the jcache perspective > i upgraded to the "snapshot" without issues) > Seems OK to me. Gary > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-09-03 22:19 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org>: > > > On 03.09.17 20:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > Thanks Thomas > > > > > > Is it the same for the code? Just realised pom were not up to date too. > > > > I released from a branch as some braking changes are already checked in > > into trunk. I'd kindly ask you to do the same if you are planning for a > > bugfix release. > > > > Bye, Thomas. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
