> Am 14.09.2017 um 22:29 schrieb Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>: > > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs and added some new feature since Commons BCEL 6.0 was > released, so I’d like to call a vote to release Commons BCEL 6.1 based on RC1. > > BCEL 6.1 RC1 is available for review her: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 21612) > > The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_1_RC1 (rev > 1808392) > > Maven artifacts are here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1263/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.1/ > > These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes > > bcel-6.1.jar.asc > (SHA1: a190964c22cb11132f3e14b71adc50b72db8d629) > bcel-6.1-sources.jar.asc > (SHA1: 5c740afacb9267135e39b3746243b22623e81d03) > bcel-6.1-test-sources.jar.asc > (SHA1: e5dcb0adad0f9c812b6da180800948e6e07652b2) > bcel-6.1-tests.jar.asc > (SHA1: 760cb782785426f647771fab73ab58a1cb34a433) > bcel-6.1-javadoc.jar > (SHA1: 64db6246e0b1fc9b4e1ba3c31c7e8251e0fe5acd) > bcel-6.1.pom.asc > (SHA1: ee13e95b11ab53ac1352404423ef365993869c83) > bcel-6.1.pom > (SHA1: b4cff8fd449d6a4ed2252182de949511034ac7b3) > bcel-6.1-sources.jar > (SHA1: fcd80e33305bbc1fdbd9456fb4f5afb454171f09) > bcel-6.1.jar > (SHA1: 6f0534a03433c804c6ad774c9c98fb7637e6fb57) > bcel-6.1-javadoc.jar.asc > (SHA1: 07bbf6ca6519a06a57a5841c768b01ac5a8302a0) > bcel-6.1-test-sources.jar > (SHA1: a73cc36bd1ed46a858316894ec0792de07b5e34a) > bcel-6.1-tests.jar > (SHA1: 71d1a2afe871aa3ece39c4b858445f764c08092d) > > I have tested this with JDK 7 using Maven 3.5.0. I’ve also tested with Java 9 > EA b181. The build fails. See BCEL-275. > > Details of changes since 6.1 are in the release notes: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.1-RC1/changes-report.html > > Site: > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.1-RC1 > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.1 directories are > not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) > > Clirr Report (compared to 6.1): > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.1-RC1/clirr-report.html > > Note that Clirr reports several errors. > These are considered OK for the reasons stated below. > These exceptions are also noted in the Changes and Release Notes. > > Errors reported: > - methods added to interface: OK because that does not affect binary > compatibility. The Visitor interface is not meant to be implemented directly > by clients. This change has also be discussed on the dev ML: > http://markmail.org/message/n445xf3f5ghkrkwe > > RAT Report: > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.1-RC1/rat-report.html > > KEYS: > https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, > i.e. sometime after 22:30 CEST (UTC+2) 17-September 2017 > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Thanks!
Hi, this vote passes with the following result: Bruno P. Kinoshita: +1 (binding) Oliver Heger: +1 (binding) Gary Gregory: +1 (binding) Mark Roberts: +1 (non-binding) Benedikt Ritter: +1 (binding) Thank you! Benedikt > > Benedikt > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
