On 12 January 2018 at 18:58, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2018-01-12, sebb wrote: > >> On 12 January 2018 at 16:45, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> By now we've got two different lists where notifications may end up, >>> the github notifications for lang go to issues@commons, those for >>> compress go to notifications@commons. > >> That seems wrong. > >> IMO >> issues should be for JIRA >> notifications for commits, CI
Did I really write that? Oops... Of course (most) commits should go to commits@ However website build commits go to notifications, as they are not as important (the source changes should go to commits@) > Oh, we've also got commits@ which gets a bunch of svn commit messages as > well as messages for some (all?) of the git repos. notifications seems > to be svn for most components and CI. > > github integration looks very inconsistent. [lang] sends to issues, > [compress] to notifications and [collections] and [imaging] even to dev > - this is judging from the archive for the past few months. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
