On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have
subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build.
Which differences did you spot?
Nothing of any particular consequence, just where the main assemblies
end up. Or which Pom they’re in.
What do you mean by "main assemblies"? If it's the "full"
distribution, then is it a matter of naming the output directory?
It could be configurable.
For the config, the main POM looks the appropriate place if it can
be done without side-effects. [For RNG I created a separate directory
because I was not sure how to do it.]
Gilles
I
figure we pick one and make that the standard multi-module build
paradigm and fit the others into it.
-Rob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
