Github user stain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
Picking up this - @ajs6f do you still think we should proceed along those
lines? I am also reluctant to making the abstract factory (builder)
serializable, but I can see the reasoning, particularly if you want to use this
in Hadoop or something where you have a pre-made parser builder and then tell a
different node to run it.
One thing I feel I need to check more is that there is no reading of the
now-usually-null fields beyond the getters - I might rename them to make that
clear.
I have put this PR into upstream branch COMMONSRDF-49 we can contribute to.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
