Git master is now on JDBC 4.2 on Java 8.

Are we OK calling the next release 2.5.0?

Gary

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 5:21 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Note that while I am working on getting git master up to JDBC 4.2 on Java
> 8, the current version is JDBC 4.3 on Java 9. I am only looking at 4.2.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 11:06 Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 17, 2018, at 12:38 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ideally, if we can just keep various branches around in releasable
>> states,
>> > then we can keep old dbcp 2.x.* maintenance releases moving forward.
>> Based
>> > on my experiences trying to release this module before, though, I think
>> > that process would need to be streamlined and backported.
>> >
>>
>> That’s what was running through my mind yesterday when I was reading the
>> discussion.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> >> On 17 June 2018 at 07:58, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 16 June 2018 at 22:41, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> Hello Mark and all,
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you for the heads up on the Tomcat plans.
>> >>>
>> >>> Asking DBCP to stay on Java 7 for 4-5 years is insane IMO, and it
>> >> certainly
>> >>> is not going to attract anyone to maintain and grow this component
>> (IMO
>> >>> again.) If that is a set of handcuffs you want to live with, then by
>> all
>> >>> means ;-)
>> >>>
>> >>> I am sure there is nothing stopping anyone at Apache to keep patches
>> >> coming
>> >>> to the DBCP 2.4.x line. I plan on keeping the release train going for
>> >> many
>> >>> Commons component, so I am happy to release DBCP at will.
>> >>>
>> >>> You will notice that
>> >>> https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-dbcp/download_dbcp.cgi
>> >> presents
>> >>> no less than tree different versions of DBCP for different antique
>> Java
>> >>> platforms. We are just going to make that list one deeper.
>> >>
>> >> I think we can now drop support for JDBC 3 and JDBC 4 (Java 6)
>> >> That leaves only JDBC 4.1 (Java 7.0) as a current release.
>> >>
>> >> Is that really too much to continue to support?
>> >>
>> >>> Again, patches are more than welcome. And do feel free to call for a
>> RC
>> >> or
>> >>> RM it yourself ;-)
>> >>>
>> >>> Gary
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:34 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 16/06/18 21:14, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> >>>>>> On 16 June 2018 at 14:11, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> What is driving the desire to move to Java 8?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> What's driving the desire to maintain support for a seven year old
>> >>>> release
>> >>>>> of Java which is not supported without paying large sums of money to
>> >>>>> Oracle?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As I said, Tomcat 8 which has at least another 4 to 5 years of life
>> in
>> >>>> it, depends on DBCP 2 and has a specification mandated requirement to
>> >>>> maintain compatibility with Java 7.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There are ways the Tomcat community could work around this. Because
>> Java
>> >>>> 7 is EOL does not - on its own - strike me as a sufficiently good
>> reason
>> >>>> to create hassle for another ASF community.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If there are new features in Java 8 we want to take advantage of or
>> an
>> >>>> update to the JDBC API that we want to support then fair enough.
>> Those
>> >>>> are good reasons but I'd like to see them explicitly articulated.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Mark
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to