> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob.
>
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:33:40 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> I know that the tests will be necessarily non-deterministic, but we
>> can at least get closer to having determinism by running the same test
>> 1000 times and expecting some reasonable number of passes right? Could
>> we use the underlying distribution that we are testing to sort out
>> this value?
>
> This *is* what the test is doing, although it repeats 50 times
> (takes quite some time already) instead of 1000.
> As I've reported on this list, it is quite possible that the
> failure probabilities are underestimated; (first) review welcome:
> the tests are fairly well documented as to what they are doing
> but I might have committed some bugs wrt the statistics involved.
Once I get the release out, I’ll have a look.
Cheers,
-Rob
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>>
>> -Rob
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
