On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:27:16 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 8, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:

Hello Rob.

On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:44:16 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
@Gilles - thoughts here?? Just kinda what I was thinking, but I’m
only a +0 on this change. So, if you want to revert it before going up
with 1.1, that’s fine.

I don't understand this change after what I answered to Gary's strange
proposal.
The comment is *wrong*. As I said previously, the base class provides boiler-plate code; that is *not* deprecated. The issue is that those methods were not meant to be used further down the hierarchy (in user's subclasses). [And now, furthermore, they are not used anymore in class "PoissonSampler", following the change in RNG-50 (delegation to other
classes).]
The sampler classes should have been made "final"; but now, this change would also be "breaking" (even though I doubt about legitimate use-cases
for inherithing from the sampler implementations).

My goal was to have the class look like is has the same functionality
at 1.0, but instead accommodate for local javadoc changes
to point out what the user should be doing. That said, it’s entirely
possible that I wasn’t precise enough with the “@deprecated” messaging
due to lack of familiarity with the issue at hand.

It is however unclear to me how these changes would be breaking as
the methods exposed on the class don’t change signature or
accessibility quantifier, but I could have overlooked something.

?
I'm saying that the appropriate change (that is: make the sampler
classes "final") would be breaking BC (in the sense that Clirr will
report errors).  However, users of this library most probably
wouldn't use it so as to be impacted by the change (that is: their
code will work as with 1.0).

Gilles

Regardless, it was just an idea, and I figured the easiest way to
make a proposal was to push a commit up. Like I said I’m a +0 on it,
and if
we come up with a better mechanism, then I’m on board with that.

Cheers,
-Rob


Please revert.

Thanks,
Gilles


-Rob

On Aug 8, 2018, at 12:42 PM, chtom...@apache.org wrote:

Repository: commons-rng
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/1.1 50b984b1d -> f8159f28a


Adding PoissonSampler deprecations. Use the correct faster public methods


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/commit/f8159f28 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/tree/f8159f28 Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/diff/f8159f28

Branch: refs/heads/1.1
Commit: f8159f28a52197d0e7b55e39b115702147cf57a0
Parents: 50b984b
Author: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com>
Authored: Wed Aug 8 12:42:45 2018 -0400
Committer: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com>
Committed: Wed Aug 8 12:42:45 2018 -0400


----------------------------------------------------------------------
.../sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)

----------------------------------------------------------------------



http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/blob/f8159f28/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java

----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java b/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java
index d0733ba..29d0e4e 100644
--- a/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java +++ b/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java
@@ -67,6 +67,48 @@ public class PoissonSampler
       return poissonSampler.sample();
   }

+    /**
+     * @return a random value from a uniform distribution in the
+     * interval {@code [0, 1)}.
+ * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+     * as it is considerably faster.
+     */
+    @Deprecated
+    protected double nextDouble() {
+        return super.nextDouble();
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @return a random {@code int} value.
+ * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+     * as it is considerably faster.
+     */
+    @Deprecated
+    protected int nextInt() {
+        return super.nextInt();
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param max Upper bound (excluded).
+ * @return a random {@code int} value in the interval {@code [0, max)}. + * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+     *      * as it is considerably faster.
+     */
+    @Deprecated
+    protected int nextInt(int max) {
+        return super.nextInt(max);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @return a random {@code long} value.
+ * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+     *      * as it is considerably faster.
+     */
+    @Deprecated
+    protected long nextLong() {
+        return super.nextLong();
+    }
+
   /** {@inheritDoc} */
   @Override
   public String toString() {



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to