On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 7:41 AM Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Fr., 24. Aug. 2018 um 09:06 Uhr schrieb Benedikt Ritter <
> brit...@apache.org>:
>
> >
> >
> > Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 20:12 Uhr schrieb sebb <seb...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Huh?
> >>
> >> Looks like the failure is due to Clirr is reporting some breaks; not
> >> sure how that can depend on the Java version.
> >>
> >
> > Maybe related to Java 8 default methods? I'm just guessing here... Need
> to
> > dig into this on the weekend.
> >
>
> It looks like this is related to Clirr handling default methods the wrong
> way. So we probably need to fix clirr in order to use it. I found a mirror
> of the code on GitHub in Emmanuel Bourg's account [1]. We could probably
> try to fix clirr, but I'd like to explore whether it would be okay to drop
> clirr entirely and only use jacimp instead (which seems to work with Java
> 8).
>

It's not clear to me that japicmp is maintained either, it has not had a
release in a long time.

Should we bring in Clirr as a Commons project if the license allows?

Gary


> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
> [1] https://github.com/ebourg/clirr/issues/1
>
>
> >
> > Benedikt
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23 August 2018 at 18:37, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > This has to do with the Java version used to run the build... I've
> seen
> >> it
> >> > locally but just switched Java version to avoid it.
> >> >
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018, 11:18 Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> it looks like the master branch build for commons-collections is
> >> failing
> >> >> for a while now [1]. Does anybody have the time to look into this?
> >> >>
> >> >> Benedikt
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/commons-collections/jobs/404183011
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to