Hello Alex.

> [...]
>
> commit 431a51b8211a40e5e8d9df0406563d4873eb4eb6
> Author: aherbert <aherb...@apache.org>
> AuthorDate: Wed Apr 10 11:01:05 2019 +0100
>
>     Disable redundant JMH benchmarks and mark as deprecated.

Is there and advantage to keeping disabled code?
[Usually, it rots silently until nobody knows why it was there... ]

If you are sure that no functionality is lost, and that the replacement
is better; I'd favour removing it.  Code archaelogists can always turn
to the VCS, if need be.

Regards,
Gilles

> ---
>  .../rng/examples/jmh/GenerationPerformance.java    | 21 ++++++++------
>  .../jmh/distribution/SamplersPerformance.java      | 33 
> ++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git 
> a/commons-rng-examples/examples-jmh/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/examples/jmh/GenerationPerformance.java
>  
> b/commons-rng-examples/examples-jmh/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/examples/jmh/GenerationPerformance.java
> index 6b4e993..741c510 100644
> --- 
> a/commons-rng-examples/examples-jmh/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/examples/jmh/GenerationPerformance.java
> +++ 
> b/commons-rng-examples/examples-jmh/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/examples/jmh/GenerationPerformance.java
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>
> [...]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to