Hi. > > [...] > > So do we do: > > UniformRandomProvider restrict(JumpableUniformRandomProvider); > JumpableUniformRandomProvider restrict(LongJumpableUniformRandomProvider); > UniformRandomProvider restrict(RestorableUniformRandomProvider); > > Or: > > UniformRandomProvider unjumpable(JumpableUniformRandomProvider); > JumpableUniformRandomProvider > unlongJumpable(LongJumpableUniformRandomProvider);
I'm a bit hesitant on the spelling... > UniformRandomProvider unrestorable(RestorableUniformRandomProvider); > > The later option only adds two new methods. The first has 3 new methods > (deprecating unrestorable with restrict) but suffers from having to cast > instances of multiple interfaces to ensure the correct restrict is called. Oops indeed. This is too error-prone. > So this makes me favour the verbosely named option. +1 Regards, Gilles > > Alex > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
