On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 14:58, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:16 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Le lun. 20 mai 2019 à 14:51, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > > > > Hi All: > > > > > > Right now, if you uses an 'include' in a properties file and that file is > > > missing, the rest of the file does not load. > > > > IMHO, it seems like a bug. > > > > If the contents is required, failure should occur because of that > > (later, according to code logic), not because the file is missing. > > > > > I'd like to add a 'includesoptional' where nothing happens if the file is > > > missing. > > > > > > Any objections or thoughts on a better name? > > > > includeifexist > > (?) > > > > Maybe; with includeoptional, I was imitating > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#includeoptional
I find includeoptional marginally easier to read. And it avoids having to remember if the spelling is includeifexist or includeifexists But I agree with Gilles that it seems like a bug if a missing include does not throw an error. > Gary > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
