On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 22:11, Mark Dacek <m...@syberion.com> wrote: > > > > I’d support adding both. > > +1 > > How about overloading as follows: > > ArrayUtils.add(T[], T, index) > > It seems inconsistent to have add() and addFirst(); that suggests > there should be an addLast() >
Indeed, the current add() is your suggested addLast(). Would you deprecate add() in favor of a new addLast() as I think we still want a short hand method for "add first". Gary > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:09 PM James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > I like it. Seems like a logical thing to do. Another idea would be > adding > > > at an arbitrary index. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:04 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All: > > > > > > > > We have org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtils.add(T[], T). > > > > > > > > WDYT about adding a method that adds the element at the beginning of > the > > > > new array instead of the end? > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
