Java 6? Really? Gary
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:06 AM Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20/06/2019 12:45, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > > The Apache Jenkins build system has built commons-rng (build #361) > > > > Status: Still Failing > > > > Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/commons-rng/361/ > to view the results. > > Jenkins is failing the RAT check on JDK 1.6 with apparently 332 > unapproved licences. > > It passes on the JDK 1.9 build. > > A vanilla git clone of the repo builds fine with this many files > included by rat: > > [INFO] 81 implicit excludes (use -debug for more details). > [INFO] 19 explicit excludes (use -debug for more details). > [INFO] 138 resources included (use -debug for more details) > > The same log output from Jenkins reads: > > [INFO] 80 implicit excludes (use -debug for more details). > [INFO] 19 explicit excludes (use -debug for more details). > [INFO] 627 resources included (use -debug for more details) > > The last successful build on Jenkins reads: > > [INFO] 81 implicit excludes (use -debug for more details). > [INFO] 19 explicit excludes (use -debug for more details). > [INFO] 136 resources included (use -debug for more details) > > Since this build I added two files so that matches with the 138 > resources in the vanilla build. > > So for some reason the latest builds have a lot more files in the > working directory. > > Is there a way to see the working directory that Jenkins is using and > the rat.txt report? There is something that should not be there. > > Is this something for INFRA to fix? > > Alex > > >
