2019-09-07 18:56 UTC+02:00, sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 17:34, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 2019-09-07 18:07 UTC+02:00, sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >> > On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 16:25, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi. >> >> >> >> 2019-09-07 11:51 UTC+02:00, sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >> >> > On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 02:25, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> 2019-09-06 16:53 UTC+02:00, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> >> >> > Hi all, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I've looked but can't find a previous vote on this. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The current logo is: >> >> >> > https://apache.org/foundation/press/kit/ApacheFoundation_StyleGuide.pdf >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The options for the new logo are: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-86 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Of those, commons_logo.small.png is not consistent with the style >> >> >> > guide >> >> >> > (the feather is rotated). >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I can't see a difference (apart from size) between >> >> >> > commons-logo_new.svg >> >> >> > and commons-logo_new4.svg. Am I missing something? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > My intention is, therefore, to put commons-logo_new[1-4].svg onto >> >> >> > a >> >> >> > wiki >> >> >> > page so they can be viewed side-by-side and then to start a VOTE. >> >> >> >> >> >> All proposals currently on that JIRA page are ruled out (see the >> >> >> URL). >> >> > >> >> > What URL and why are they disqualified? >> >> > >> >> >> >> http vs https >> > >> > Whilst http may be deprecated, AFAIK it is not forbidden. >> >> Creating a new logo for Commons that would contain >> an outdated element does not make much sense. >> >> > Besides, it should be trivial to change it. >> >> Sure. But as they stand, those images contain an objectively >> undesirable feature. > > Not everyone agrees, please read: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18923?focusedCommentId=16914202&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16914202 > > You wrote 'ruled out', which I took to mean 'disallowed'. > >> [IIRC, you corrected many such uses of "http://";.] > > As I recall, I changed the links to KEYS, hashes and sigs -- which > MUST use https. > That is quite different from using https for websites.
Is it better to have the feather not tilted? Is it better to advertise "https" rather than "http"? This was just another remark about how the logos which we were supposed to vote on can (should, IMO) be improved (on top of the foundation's preferences about the feather to be kept untouched). [This discussion is quite pointless since we are going to delegate that work.] Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
