@Gilles Missed your suggestion about modularity. Can you point me to the original message or paraphrase it here?
Claude On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:03 AM Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote: > Le jeu. 12 sept. 2019 à 10:28, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:06:59 +0100, Claude Warren <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Actually the code I was thinking of is the multi-filter branch. It > cleans > > > up some names and simplifies a few things. The collections and storage > > > packages might be best added as examples rather than as mainline code. > > > > > > In this case we just provide the bloom filter implementation, If we > want > > > to provide the container implementation then I think it should > probably be > > > modified to accept any SortedSet or NavigatableSet in the constructor. > > > > > > When I return home, next week, I'll take a swipe at moving the packages > > > over to org.apache.commons.collections4.bloomfilter package (unless > there > > > is a better package name). We can then look at the entire code > donation > > > and decide what changes need to be made before it is accepted. > > > > > > Does this sound like a reasonable approach? > > Any comment about my suggestion to make [Collections] modular, > starting with that code ([Collections] is nearing 30k LOC...)? > > Gilles > > > [...] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
